Family Systems & Couples Comparisons

Comparing structural, strategic, Bowenian, EFT for couples, Gottman, IFS and related systemic approaches.

Systemic approaches relocate the problem from the person to the pattern between people, and then disagree about which pattern and at what level. Structural work rearranges boundaries and hierarchy. Strategic work interrupts the sequence that keeps a symptom in place. Attachment-based couple work goes after the cycle underneath the content of the fight. Internal Family Systems takes the systemic move and turns it inward, treating one mind as a family of parts.

These pages compare what each approach asks of the people in the room — who has to attend, who is treated as the client, and what counts as change — alongside the evidence, which is stronger in this lineage than its reputation suggests for several couple and family protocols and thin for others.

34 comparisons · 13 within the same tradition · 21 across traditions


Across traditions

Comparisons where the two approaches disagree about what a person is, not only about technique.

Within the same tradition

Comparisons between approaches that share a worldview and differ in method or emphasis.


Other comparison hubs