Personality & Long-Standing Patterns
Reese, 31, non-binary, barista and part-time artist
Presentation
Referred after third psychiatric hospitalization in two years for suicidal gestures following relationship breakups. Intense, unstable relationships — idealizes new partners, then rages when they disappoint. Self-harm (cutting) since adolescence, currently 1-2x/month. Says: 'Everyone leaves. I make sure of it.' Diagnosed BPD at 25.
History
Foster care from age 4 after parental neglect. Three foster placements by age 10. Sexual abuse by foster sibling at 12, disclosed but not believed. Adopted at 13 by a well-meaning but emotionally distant couple. Multiple therapists — fired or quit on most of them. Currently on sertraline and low-dose quetiapine.
Where Approaches Genuinely Disagree
The patient needs to see their distortions in real time. Interpreting transference — including aggression — is the work.
Confrontation without validation is retraumatizing. The relationship must be safe before it can be challenging.
Philosophical Lenses
These are not treatment plans. They are ways of seeing — philosophical perspectives that illuminate aspects of this case that clinical modalities may not address directly.
Reese's pattern — idealization, rage, self-harm, hospitalization — looks like repetition compulsion from a psychoanalytic frame. Sartre would see it as bad faith: the refusal to acknowledge freedom. Each cycle begins with the other being made into the guarantor of meaning ('this person will save me') and ends with the discovery that no other person can bear that weight. The rage is not at the partner but at the impossibility of the project. Reese is attempting what Sartre called the fundamental project of being — trying to become an object (solid, certain, defined by the other's love) while remaining a subject. This is impossible. Therapy is the confrontation with that impossibility and the anguish of freedom it reveals.
Reese's relational pattern is a form of what Levinas would call totalization — the reduction of the Other to a category within the self's economy of need. In the idealizing phase, the partner is consumed as an object of absolute need: not encountered as Other but incorporated as the missing ground of the self. In the rageful phase, the partner who fails this impossible function is expelled — but what is expelled is still not the Other as Other, only the failed need-object. Levinas's ethics demands something Reese has never experienced: letting the Other be genuinely other, irreducible to what I need them to be. This is not a relational skill to be learned. It is an ethical orientation that presupposes a subject who can bear the infinite demand of a face that will never be 'enough' because it was never supposed to be.
8 Formulations
Select 2–3 modalities to compare side by side:
Sources & Method
This is a composite fictional case — no real client is depicted. Formulations represent how each modality would typically conceptualize and approach a case with this presentation, based on published clinical literature and training materials. Each formulation draws on the modality's own theoretical framework, key texts, and clinical principles as documented on its modality page. Full source citations for every modality are available on the Sources page.