Modalities / Cognitive-Behavioral

Acceptance-Based Behavior Therapy

Lizabeth Roemer / Susan Orsillo · 2002
Key text: Mindfulness- and Acceptance-Based Behavioral Therapies in Practice (Roemer & Orsillo, 2009); A Practical Guide to Acceptance-Based Behavioral Therapy (Orsillo & Roemer, 2011)
Cognitive-Behavioral Focus: Skill-building + Values Short to medium (12-16 sessions) Individual

Core Mechanism

Reducing experiential avoidance of anxious internal states through mindful awareness and acceptance, combined with clarifying values and taking committed action, breaks the cycle of worry and behavioral restriction that maintains GAD

Ontology

Anxiety disorders, particularly GAD, are maintained by the struggle against internal experience. The problem is not anxiety itself but the avoidance of anxiety that narrows behavioral repertoire and prevents valued living.

Therapeutic Voice

"What would you do differently this week if anxiety were not running the show? Not if it were gone — just if it were not in charge."

View of the Person

A being whose suffering is amplified by the attempt to control or eliminate internal experience. The path is not through reduction of anxiety but through expanding the capacity to have anxiety while living according to one's values.


Evidence

Not listed separately from ACT in most guidelines; APA Division 12 recognizes acceptance-based approaches for GAD

RCTs by Roemer, Orsillo & colleagues specifically for GAD; strong evidence base for primary target population

Included in broader ACT/acceptance-based meta-analyses; specific GAD evidence base robust

ABBT deserves recognition as a distinct approach because it developed independently with its own RCT program specifically targeting GAD, which has historically been one of the more difficult anxiety disorders to treat. Roemer and Orsillo's work has influenced the broader acceptance-based CBT field. The explicit focus on valued living as an antidote to worry-driven avoidance is clinically distinctive. Worth knowing separately from ACT for clinicians who primarily treat anxiety disorders.


Conditions

Epistemology

Empiricist

Blind Spots

Substantial overlap with ACT makes independent identity difficult to maintain in the field; limited dissemination infrastructure compared to ACT; primarily validated for GAD rather than broad transdiagnostic application

Contraindications

Active psychosis, severe cognitive impairment, situations requiring immediate crisis intervention, clients who need concrete symptom reduction before acceptance-oriented work


Training

ACT training helpful foundation; ABBT-specific protocol training through Roemer and Orsillo workshops or self-study of treatment manuals

No formal certification; training through ACBS and workshop programs

2-3 day workshop plus supervised cases

$500-1500 for workshop training

Equity & Cultural Adaptations

Cross-cultural adaptationsAccessibility accommodations

Philosophical Roots

Hayes (acceptance and commitment; contextual behavioral science); Kabat-Zinn (mindfulness-based stress reduction); Borkovec (GAD as cognitive avoidance); behavioral learning theory; Buddhist psychology (non-judgmental awareness)

Related Modalities

Test Yourself

How is ABBT different from ACT?

Show answer

ABBT was developed specifically for generalized anxiety disorder and integrates more explicitly with traditional behavioral therapy techniques and the GAD literature. While ACT is transdiagnostic and emphasizes psychological flexibility through six core processes, ABBT has a tighter focus on the mechanisms specific to worry and GAD — particularly the role of experiential avoidance in maintaining anxiety. Both share mindfulness and acceptance foundations, but ABBT has its own RCT evidence base and protocol. Roemer and Orsillo were working independently from Hayes's ACT group.


Sources

Roemer, L. & Orsillo, S.M. (2009). Mindfulness- and Acceptance-Based Behavioral Therapies in Practice.
Orsillo, S.M. & Roemer, L. (2011). The Mindful Way Through Anxiety.