Problem-Solving Therapy vs SFBT

A side-by-side comparison: mechanism, evidence, the conditions each treats, philosophical roots, and where they actually disagree clinically.

At a glance

Problem-Solving Therapy

Tradition
Cognitive-Behavioral
Founder
D'Zurilla / Nezu (1971)
Evidence
Guideline-recommended
Focus
Skill-building
Format
Individual
Duration
Short-term

SFBT

Tradition
Postmodern
Founder
de Shazer / Insoo Kim Berg (1985)
Evidence
Guideline-recommended
Focus
Strengths-based
Format
Indiv + Family + Group
Duration
Very short (1-8)

How they work

Problem-Solving Therapy

Core mechanism: Structured problem-solving skills (define, generate, evaluate, implement) counteract hopelessness and behavioral inaction in depression

Ontology: Depression maintained by poor problem orientation (negative appraisal of problems) and deficient problem-solving skills

SFBT

Core mechanism: Identifying exceptions, preferred futures, and existing strengths amplifies what already works; solution-building vs. problem-solving

Ontology: Problems are not continuous; exceptions exist. Focusing on problems maintains problems; focusing on solutions builds solutions

Conditions treated

1 shared · 1 Problem-Solving Therapy-only · 3 SFBT-only

What each assumes — and misses

Problem-Solving Therapy

Philosophical roots: Dewey (reflective problem-solving); cognitive-behavioral tradition; D'Zurilla (social problem-solving model); pragmatism

Blind spots: Narrow skill focus may miss emotional depth; assumes problems are solvable — less suited for existential or grief concerns

Therapeutic voice: Let's list every possible solution, even the ones that seem impractical. We'll evaluate them after.

SFBT

Philosophical roots: Wittgenstein (language games — meaning is use); de Shazer (solution-focused); social constructionism (Gergen); pragmatism (what works matters more than why)

Blind spots: May minimize genuine suffering by focusing prematurely on solutions; limited depth for complex trauma or personality work

Therapeutic voice: Tell me about a recent time when the problem wasn't happening. What was different?

Choosing between them

Problem-Solving Therapy (Cognitive-Behavioral) and SFBT (Postmodern) come from different traditions, which means they assume different things about what a person is, what causes suffering, and what the therapeutic relationship is for. The choice between them is often less about "which works better" and more about which set of assumptions fits the client and the therapist.

For deeper coverage: see the full Problem-Solving Therapy and SFBT pages, or use the interactive comparison tool to add more modalities to this comparison.